Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7831 - 7840 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 7831 - 7840 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
State v. Roy E. Ridener
and was informed of his right to file a response. Ridener has not responded although the court extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9598 - 2017-09-19
and was informed of his right to file a response. Ridener has not responded although the court extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9598 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and thirteen years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244605 - 2019-08-07
and thirteen years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244605 - 2019-08-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of two years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. On the theft charge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491853 - 2022-03-10
of two years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. On the theft charge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491853 - 2022-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, it is not clear what remedy Pophal sought in the petition. The circuit court has no authority to extend the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116810 - 2014-07-14
, it is not clear what remedy Pophal sought in the petition. The circuit court has no authority to extend the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116810 - 2014-07-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484186 - 2022-02-16
years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484186 - 2022-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and two years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Dotson’s pleas were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111372 - 2017-09-21
and two years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Dotson’s pleas were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111372 - 2017-09-21
SCR CHAPTER 33
the period of extension at up to 4 months. For good cause shown, the committee may extend further the period
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1090 - 2011-07-04
the period of extension at up to 4 months. For good cause shown, the committee may extend further the period
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1090 - 2011-07-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of one year of initial confinement followed by two years of extended supervision. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211997 - 2018-04-25
of one year of initial confinement followed by two years of extended supervision. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211997 - 2018-04-25
CA Blank Order
five years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. There is no manifest injustice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119178 - 2014-08-11
five years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. There is no manifest injustice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119178 - 2014-08-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses: (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473406 - 2022-01-19
years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses: (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473406 - 2022-01-19