Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7831 - 7840 of 57333 for id.
Search results 7831 - 7840 of 57333 for id.
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
id. This court cannot substitute its judgment. Kachelski based his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12451 - 2005-03-31
id. This court cannot substitute its judgment. Kachelski based his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id., ¶10. We uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109478 - 2017-09-21
. Id., ¶10. We uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence modification. Id., ¶¶36-37. ¶5 A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172786 - 2017-09-21
sentence modification. Id., ¶¶36-37. ¶5 A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172786 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
justifying the court’s reconsideration.” Id. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48243 - 2014-09-15
justifying the court’s reconsideration.” Id. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48243 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Harris
as the “counsel” guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. See id. Review of counsel’s performance gives great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10759 - 2017-09-20
as the “counsel” guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. See id. Review of counsel’s performance gives great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10759 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel told Minnick about possible sentences. Id., ¶9. We held that the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228671 - 2018-11-28
trial counsel told Minnick about possible sentences. Id., ¶9. We held that the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228671 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Encarnacion F.
they are against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. See id. at 208, 539 N.W.2d at 891
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14501 - 2017-09-21
they are against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. See id. at 208, 539 N.W.2d at 891
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14501 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
id. This court cannot substitute its judgment. Kachelski based his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12449 - 2005-03-31
id. This court cannot substitute its judgment. Kachelski based his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12449 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cleveland Brown
fact. Id., ¶5. The appellate court reviews questions of constitutional fact under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19345 - 2017-09-21
fact. Id., ¶5. The appellate court reviews questions of constitutional fact under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19345 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” and “has developed specialized experience, expertise, and knowledge concerning bad faith.” Id., ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143554 - 2017-09-21
” and “has developed specialized experience, expertise, and knowledge concerning bad faith.” Id., ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143554 - 2017-09-21