Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7831 - 7840 of 18662 for quote.
Search results 7831 - 7840 of 18662 for quote.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 678 N.W.2d 197 (quoting McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 276, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971)). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84332 - 2014-09-15
, 678 N.W.2d 197 (quoting McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 276, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971)). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84332 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.” Id., ¶40 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80278 - 2012-04-02
, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.” Id., ¶40 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80278 - 2012-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” Anderson, 155 Wis. 2d at 84 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 23)). ¶11 Russell points to possible innocent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30941 - 2007-11-20
.’” Anderson, 155 Wis. 2d at 84 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 23)). ¶11 Russell points to possible innocent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30941 - 2007-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
,’ we will affirm that verdict.” (quoted source omitted)). The State presented evidence that Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147252 - 2015-08-26
,’ we will affirm that verdict.” (quoted source omitted)). The State presented evidence that Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147252 - 2015-08-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will be on a particular case.’” Coachella, 112 P.3d at 628 (quoted source omitted). Coachella is not binding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504954 - 2022-04-07
will be on a particular case.’” Coachella, 112 P.3d at 628 (quoted source omitted). Coachella is not binding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504954 - 2022-04-07
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Wood
.” State v. Franklin, 148 Wis.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989) (quoted source omitted). The purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15821 - 2017-09-21
.” State v. Franklin, 148 Wis.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989) (quoted source omitted). The purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, then there is no ambiguity, and the statute is applied according to this ascertainment of its meaning.” Id. (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123528 - 2017-09-21
, then there is no ambiguity, and the statute is applied according to this ascertainment of its meaning.” Id. (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123528 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ch. 766. The first is that, quoting WIS. STAT. § 766.62(1) and (2), “a deferred employment benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156974 - 2017-09-21
. ch. 766. The first is that, quoting WIS. STAT. § 766.62(1) and (2), “a deferred employment benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156974 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
present.” We are not persuaded. [6] Mortag misquotes our decision. She quotes our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34756 - 2008-12-01
present.” We are not persuaded. [6] Mortag misquotes our decision. She quotes our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34756 - 2008-12-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not presented to the lower court.’” (quoted source omitted)); State v. Truax, 151 Wis. 2d 354, 359, 444 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913864 - 2025-02-13
not presented to the lower court.’” (quoted source omitted)); State v. Truax, 151 Wis. 2d 354, 359, 444 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913864 - 2025-02-13