Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78331 - 78340 of 87652 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 78331 - 78340 of 87652 for affidavit of filing.
Wendy Marie Henderson v. John Glaus
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10717 - 2005-03-31
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10717 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a motion to refund the DNA surcharge. He noted that the DNA surcharge was not mandatory in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260651 - 2020-05-20
filed a motion to refund the DNA surcharge. He noted that the DNA surcharge was not mandatory in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260651 - 2020-05-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Champeau
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12147 - 2017-09-21
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and appealable document from which Canales failed to file a timely notice of appeal. Accordingly, we held
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107686 - 2017-09-21
and appealable document from which Canales failed to file a timely notice of appeal. Accordingly, we held
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107686 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
AP000895 CR State v. Ronald J. Wendling
filed its opinion in each of the above-entitled appeals and the court having concluded pursuant to Wis
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274372 - 2020-07-28
filed its opinion in each of the above-entitled appeals and the court having concluded pursuant to Wis
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274372 - 2020-07-28
[PDF]
WI 40
Rule 10.03(4)(b)2 Relating to pro hac vice applications FILED MAY 4, 2021 Sheila T
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364293 - 2021-05-04
Rule 10.03(4)(b)2 Relating to pro hac vice applications FILED MAY 4, 2021 Sheila T
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364293 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conviction. Attorney Dennis Schertz has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421167 - 2021-09-08
conviction. Attorney Dennis Schertz has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421167 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Judge. Counsel for Allan J. Wickware has filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94340 - 2014-09-15
Judge. Counsel for Allan J. Wickware has filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94340 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, dated February 1, 2016, was based on a bench ruling that limited Kreger to submitting only one filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192917 - 2017-09-21
, dated February 1, 2016, was based on a bench ruling that limited Kreger to submitting only one filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192917 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Counsel for James Baeten has filed a no-merit report concluding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240376 - 2019-05-07
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Counsel for James Baeten has filed a no-merit report concluding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240376 - 2019-05-07