Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7841 - 7850 of 83284 for case search.
Search results 7841 - 7850 of 83284 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
and his passenger. At this point another officer arrived. Passet briefed her on the case and “suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68030 - 2011-07-19
and his passenger. At this point another officer arrived. Passet briefed her on the case and “suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68030 - 2011-07-19
State v. Joseph G. Scalissi
and/or dismiss the case for lack of probable cause to arrest him. ¶3 At the evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25725 - 2006-06-28
and/or dismiss the case for lack of probable cause to arrest him. ¶3 At the evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25725 - 2006-06-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be in the house. She gave police permission to enter and search her home. Police found Hill in the house
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534021 - 2022-06-21
be in the house. She gave police permission to enter and search her home. Police found Hill in the house
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534021 - 2022-06-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
her on the case and “suggested that she contact a drug dog based on the information that [he] had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68030 - 2014-09-15
her on the case and “suggested that she contact a drug dog based on the information that [he] had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68030 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Wilder
and searched him for weapons. The trial court denied his motion to suppress.1 We affirm. I. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10563 - 2017-09-20
and searched him for weapons. The trial court denied his motion to suppress.1 We affirm. I. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10563 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Weaver’s arguments. Subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241637 - 2019-06-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Weaver’s arguments. Subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241637 - 2019-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Wondergem
suppressed Wondergem’s statements. We also conclude that, under the unusual circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13739 - 2014-09-15
suppressed Wondergem’s statements. We also conclude that, under the unusual circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13739 - 2014-09-15
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
appeals. II. DISCUSSION The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10113 - 2005-03-31
appeals. II. DISCUSSION The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kenneth Krebs v. David H. Schwarz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2596 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11402 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2596 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11402 - 2017-09-19
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
appeals. II. DISCUSSION The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10114 - 2005-03-31
appeals. II. DISCUSSION The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10114 - 2005-03-31