Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7841 - 7850 of 19288 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 7841 - 7850 of 19288 for transfer by affidavit.
COURT OF APPEALS
fees. In a supplemental affidavit, Kilian requested an additional $29,096.75 in fees. Mercedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94333 - 2013-03-26
fees. In a supplemental affidavit, Kilian requested an additional $29,096.75 in fees. Mercedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94333 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Collins
jury’s function to determine witness credibility. In an affidavit in support of the motion, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4439 - 2017-09-19
jury’s function to determine witness credibility. In an affidavit in support of the motion, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4439 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Leo Dunlap v. City of Kenosha
for use of pedestrians.” ¶8 In its summary judgment materials, the City offered the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19871 - 2017-09-21
for use of pedestrians.” ¶8 In its summary judgment materials, the City offered the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19871 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
filed an affidavit of noncompliance and application seeking to vacate the dismissal of the eviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28577 - 2007-03-26
filed an affidavit of noncompliance and application seeking to vacate the dismissal of the eviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28577 - 2007-03-26
Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County
judgment because the County did not present an affidavit relating to the first and third claims in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9894 - 2005-03-31
judgment because the County did not present an affidavit relating to the first and third claims in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9894 - 2005-03-31
Eddie D. Cannon v. State
. The trial court prematurely relied on this reason to deny the motion. Cannon’s affidavit does aver that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8639 - 2012-03-31
. The trial court prematurely relied on this reason to deny the motion. Cannon’s affidavit does aver that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8639 - 2012-03-31
Accu-Tech Plastics, Inc. v. Midwest Microform Industries, Inc.
). The trial court has discretion as to whether this proof will be in the form of a hearing or by affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5508 - 2005-03-31
). The trial court has discretion as to whether this proof will be in the form of a hearing or by affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5508 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on a July 20, 2010 affidavit provided by Clark is improper as it postdates the notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2012-11-29
on a July 20, 2010 affidavit provided by Clark is improper as it postdates the notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2012-11-29
[PDF]
Donald Lindquist v. Deborah Lindquist
as an “income assignment for future maintenance payments.” (Emphasis added.) Deborah’s affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11419 - 2017-09-19
as an “income assignment for future maintenance payments.” (Emphasis added.) Deborah’s affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11419 - 2017-09-19
Robert Pence v. M&I Central State Bank
then filed an Affidavit of No Answer and a Motion for Default Judgment. M&I filed a motion for change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5086 - 2005-03-31
then filed an Affidavit of No Answer and a Motion for Default Judgment. M&I filed a motion for change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5086 - 2005-03-31