Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78411 - 78420 of 87682 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 78411 - 78420 of 87682 for affidavit of filing.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that “there is no merit to the appeal filed by [Doe]” and there is no basis to order the county to pay the costs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185774 - 2017-09-21
that “there is no merit to the appeal filed by [Doe]” and there is no basis to order the county to pay the costs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185774 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
for Dustin Pingel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14),[1] concluding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141759 - 2008-01-03
for Dustin Pingel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14),[1] concluding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141759 - 2008-01-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (2021-22).1 We summarily affirm. Grant filed a petition for name change asserting that his name
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698460 - 2023-09-06
) (2021-22).1 We summarily affirm. Grant filed a petition for name change asserting that his name
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698460 - 2023-09-06
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. Blackwelder subsequently filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99346 - 2013-07-16
of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. Blackwelder subsequently filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99346 - 2013-07-16
Wisconsin RSA #7 General Partner, Inc. v. United States Cellular Corporation
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8068 - 2005-03-31
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8068 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
has now filed a no-merit report seeking permission to withdraw. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2009-10
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91599 - 2013-01-10
has now filed a no-merit report seeking permission to withdraw. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2009-10
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91599 - 2013-01-10
Michael Anderson v. Debra Anderson
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8607 - 2005-03-31
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8607 - 2005-03-31
Thomas Gritzner v. Michael R.
. 2d 541, 598 N.W.2d 282 (Ct. App. 1999-Published) Opinion Filed: June 23, 2000
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17359 - 2005-03-31
. 2d 541, 598 N.W.2d 282 (Ct. App. 1999-Published) Opinion Filed: June 23, 2000
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17359 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Reported at 375 Wis. 2d 796, 899 N.W.2d 737 (2017 – unpublished) OPINION FILED: June 28, 2017
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214898 - 2018-06-28
Reported at 375 Wis. 2d 796, 899 N.W.2d 737 (2017 – unpublished) OPINION FILED: June 28, 2017
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214898 - 2018-06-28
Frontsheet
Filed: March 23, 2011 Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument: November 3, 2010 Source of Appeal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61682 - 2011-03-22
Filed: March 23, 2011 Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument: November 3, 2010 Source of Appeal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61682 - 2011-03-22