Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7851 - 7860 of 50070 for our.
Search results 7851 - 7860 of 50070 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
with one of our unpublished decisions, State v. Gerondale, Nos. 2009AP1237/1238-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109909 - 2014-04-08
with one of our unpublished decisions, State v. Gerondale, Nos. 2009AP1237/1238-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109909 - 2014-04-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783339 - 2024-04-02
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783339 - 2024-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783339 - 2024-04-02
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783339 - 2024-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not have the opportunity to cross-examine the author of the report. Based on our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1019571 - 2025-10-09
not have the opportunity to cross-examine the author of the report. Based on our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1019571 - 2025-10-09
State v. Brian Mallory
, 235 Wis. 2d 143, 612 N.W.2d 746. Although the supreme court reversed our decision in Mentek on other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6629 - 2005-03-31
, 235 Wis. 2d 143, 612 N.W.2d 746. Although the supreme court reversed our decision in Mentek on other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Brian E. Davis’s notice of appeal before this court recites that it seeks our review of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26670 - 2014-09-15
Brian E. Davis’s notice of appeal before this court recites that it seeks our review of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26670 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. Our review of summary judgment decisions is de novo, meaning that we independently review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134340 - 2015-02-04
judgment. Our review of summary judgment decisions is de novo, meaning that we independently review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134340 - 2015-02-04
CA Blank Order
relief. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110284 - 2014-04-15
relief. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110284 - 2014-04-15
State v. Robert R. Shaffer
of his right to respond to the no merit report and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11137 - 2005-03-31
of his right to respond to the no merit report and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11137 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Perkins appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138484 - 2015-03-31
. Perkins appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138484 - 2015-03-31