Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7851 - 7860 of 50070 for our.
Search results 7851 - 7860 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
analyzes the issues it raises. Based on our independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456614 - 2021-11-30
analyzes the issues it raises. Based on our independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456614 - 2021-11-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129276 - 2017-09-21
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129276 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. A challenge to a circuit court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156585 - 2017-09-21
. A challenge to a circuit court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460412 - 2021-12-09
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460412 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140016 - 2017-09-21
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140016 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also addresses whether a challenge to Eleby’s sentence would have arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293193 - 2020-10-01
also addresses whether a challenge to Eleby’s sentence would have arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293193 - 2020-10-01
[PDF]
State v. Stephanie B. Holmes
, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11609 - 2017-09-19
, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11609 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
whether Clark could claim that trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493100 - 2022-03-10
whether Clark could claim that trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493100 - 2022-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Johnston was informed of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130018 - 2017-09-21
. Johnston was informed of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit relating to pretrial or trial proceedings, we conclude based on our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858345 - 2024-10-10
merit relating to pretrial or trial proceedings, we conclude based on our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858345 - 2024-10-10