Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7851 - 7860 of 83387 for simple case search.
Search results 7851 - 7860 of 83387 for simple case search.
2007 WI APP 172
2007 WI App 172 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1929 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29294 - 2007-07-24
2007 WI App 172 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1929 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29294 - 2007-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case arises out of a motor vehicle accident in which Lorraine Zeichert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213135 - 2018-05-22
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case arises out of a motor vehicle accident in which Lorraine Zeichert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213135 - 2018-05-22
09AP2667 State v. Dakota A.K.
the court commissioner called the case on July 7, 2009, Wingrove stated he was not prepared to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48272 - 2010-03-23
the court commissioner called the case on July 7, 2009, Wingrove stated he was not prepared to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48272 - 2010-03-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
the case on July 7, 2009, Wingrove stated he was not prepared to proceed because the prosecutor had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48272 - 2014-09-15
the case on July 7, 2009, Wingrove stated he was not prepared to proceed because the prosecutor had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48272 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Clause violation alleged in that case was that the expert witness who testified regarding Griep’s blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199518 - 2017-10-31
Clause violation alleged in that case was that the expert witness who testified regarding Griep’s blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199518 - 2017-10-31
[PDF]
State v. Quathico D. Love
the court’s finding that he consented to a search was clearly erroneous. We conclude it was not, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13722 - 2014-09-15
the court’s finding that he consented to a search was clearly erroneous. We conclude it was not, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13722 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony M. Reynolds
it: (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of the residence where he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10504 - 2005-03-31
it: (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of the residence where he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10504 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
its discretion when it failed to dismiss the case with prejudice. Because the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35494 - 2009-02-09
its discretion when it failed to dismiss the case with prejudice. Because the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35494 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
). No. 2008AP836 2 exercised its discretion when it failed to dismiss the case with prejudice. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35494 - 2014-09-15
). No. 2008AP836 2 exercised its discretion when it failed to dismiss the case with prejudice. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35494 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI App 23
2009 WI App 23 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2931 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35244 - 2009-02-23
2009 WI App 23 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2931 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35244 - 2009-02-23