Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78541 - 78550 of 83799 for simple case search.
Search results 78541 - 78550 of 83799 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[o]nce evidence was suppressed, the Circuit Court correctly dismissed the County’s case against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234278 - 2019-02-07
that “[o]nce evidence was suppressed, the Circuit Court correctly dismissed the County’s case against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234278 - 2019-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pleaded not guilty and the case proceeded to a jury trial. Deputy Hodges and Pamela Dunphy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97194 - 2014-09-15
pleaded not guilty and the case proceeded to a jury trial. Deputy Hodges and Pamela Dunphy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97194 - 2014-09-15
Dan Paar v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
conduct in the case, the only such incident in thirteen years of employment, was not misconduct. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7197 - 2005-05-31
conduct in the case, the only such incident in thirteen years of employment, was not misconduct. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7197 - 2005-05-31
[PDF]
State v. Archie F. Gill
report in case the report’s author had erroneously assumed that the maximum was sixteen years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12325 - 2017-09-21
report in case the report’s author had erroneously assumed that the maximum was sixteen years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12325 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Marty S. Madeiros
119, 126, 332 N.W.2d 744, 748 (1983). ¶7 In this case, Madeiros pled guilty to OMVWI (second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3069 - 2017-09-19
119, 126, 332 N.W.2d 744, 748 (1983). ¶7 In this case, Madeiros pled guilty to OMVWI (second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3069 - 2017-09-19
State v. Darnial C. Craig
In this case, defense counsel testified that he did not ask for the accomplice instruction because he felt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2860 - 2005-03-31
In this case, defense counsel testified that he did not ask for the accomplice instruction because he felt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2860 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald J. Dockry
there are fewer indicia of intoxication than in Swanson or Seibel. Under the dictates of these cases, the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2863 - 2005-03-31
there are fewer indicia of intoxication than in Swanson or Seibel. Under the dictates of these cases, the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2863 - 2005-03-31
Etta Dus v. Steven Ambrose Dus
to consider an issue raised in Steven’s trial brief but not addressed by the trial court. In cases involving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12061 - 2005-03-31
to consider an issue raised in Steven’s trial brief but not addressed by the trial court. In cases involving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12061 - 2005-03-31
State v. Duane Joseph Lieske
the desire to try the case. State v. Canedy, 161 Wis.2d 565, 583, 469 N.W.2d 163, 170-71 (1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9462 - 2005-03-31
the desire to try the case. State v. Canedy, 161 Wis.2d 565, 583, 469 N.W.2d 163, 170-71 (1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9462 - 2005-03-31
State v. William H. Jones
in this case. The form asks the following question: “Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test for your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15086 - 2005-03-31
in this case. The form asks the following question: “Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test for your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15086 - 2005-03-31