Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7861 - 7870 of 11879 for affidavit.
Search results 7861 - 7870 of 11879 for affidavit.
COURT OF APPEALS
stated in an affidavit that Jim Brennan was the DOR employee who had worked with King’s Enterprises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103127 - 2013-10-16
stated in an affidavit that Jim Brennan was the DOR employee who had worked with King’s Enterprises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103127 - 2013-10-16
Gregg Hagopian v. Lawrence Lind
representations to the Hagopians, and when they signed the Offer, the Condition Report, and the Affidavit; (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14881 - 2005-03-31
representations to the Hagopians, and when they signed the Offer, the Condition Report, and the Affidavit; (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14881 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the parties’ intent. The record contains affidavits and deposition testimony by Doherty and Mangless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92477 - 2013-02-04
the parties’ intent. The record contains affidavits and deposition testimony by Doherty and Mangless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92477 - 2013-02-04
[PDF]
Delmar F. Renak v. Raymond G. Feest
the business and, in fact, have torn the shop down. (See affidavit of Daniel Feest.) In negotiating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18876 - 2017-09-21
the business and, in fact, have torn the shop down. (See affidavit of Daniel Feest.) In negotiating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18876 - 2017-09-21
The North Bay Co. v. Washburn County Zoning Committee
and awarded a $5,501 fee and $761.11 in costs and disbursements. This sum is supported by the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10052 - 2005-03-31
and awarded a $5,501 fee and $761.11 in costs and disbursements. This sum is supported by the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10052 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240597 - 2019-05-14
to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240597 - 2019-05-14
State v. Bernard A. James
justified a modification of his sentence. The new factor, according to James’s affidavit, was that when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31
justified a modification of his sentence. The new factor, according to James’s affidavit, was that when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the residents of the subdivision identified the Wambold heirs and obtained affidavits from them attesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872463 - 2024-11-06
, the residents of the subdivision identified the Wambold heirs and obtained affidavits from them attesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872463 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771185 - 2024-03-05
, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771185 - 2024-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
a significant hurdle at trial: The Pahl affidavit specifically states that “it is [Pahl’s] professional opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-25
a significant hurdle at trial: The Pahl affidavit specifically states that “it is [Pahl’s] professional opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-25