Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7861 - 7870 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7861 - 7870 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
in the trial court’s decision on his postconviction motion. However, our review is de novo, id. at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5997 - 2017-09-19
in the trial court’s decision on his postconviction motion. However, our review is de novo, id. at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5997 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Patton, 2006 WI App 235, ¶7, 297 Wis. 2d 415, 724 N.W.2d 347. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51937 - 2010-07-13
. State v. Patton, 2006 WI App 235, ¶7, 297 Wis. 2d 415, 724 N.W.2d 347. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51937 - 2010-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Whether the jury was properly instructed is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
. Whether the jury was properly instructed is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
State v. Toby J. Vandenberg
of counsel is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13503 - 2005-03-31
of counsel is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13503 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in this appeal is whether J.D. was deprived of his statutory right to counsel. That issue is reviewed de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649064 - 2023-04-27
in this appeal is whether J.D. was deprived of his statutory right to counsel. That issue is reviewed de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649064 - 2023-04-27
State v. Tong T.
constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. However, whether a new factor warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5687 - 2005-03-31
constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. However, whether a new factor warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5687 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. Id., ¶9. On appeal, Wyman first contends that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163905 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. Id., ¶9. On appeal, Wyman first contends that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
responsibility. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See Tammy W-G., 333 Wis. 2d 273, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73795 - 2014-09-15
responsibility. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See Tammy W-G., 333 Wis. 2d 273, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73795 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. Whether a new factor exists is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶6. A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121309 - 2014-09-15
. Id. Whether a new factor exists is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶6. A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121309 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Alexander F. Godlewski
was an isolated comment; any prejudice that may have flowed from it was de minimis as shown by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20427 - 2017-09-21
was an isolated comment; any prejudice that may have flowed from it was de minimis as shown by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20427 - 2017-09-21