Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7861 - 7870 of 29419 for er.
Search results 7861 - 7870 of 29419 for er.
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 21-01 supporting memo
: . . . (er) A “government lawyer” includes a “prosecutor” as defined by SCR 20:1.0(j) and any lawyer who
/supreme/docs/2101memo.pdf - 2021-05-26
: . . . (er) A “government lawyer” includes a “prosecutor” as defined by SCR 20:1.0(j) and any lawyer who
/supreme/docs/2101memo.pdf - 2021-05-26
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - December 2009
court erred by not allowing him to withdraw a guilty plea. The plea was not entered knowingly
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43927 - 2014-09-15
court erred by not allowing him to withdraw a guilty plea. The plea was not entered knowingly
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43927 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2019
; and that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to represent himself. The Court of Appeals disagreed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238667 - 2019-04-04
; and that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to represent himself. The Court of Appeals disagreed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238667 - 2019-04-04
State v. Barry A. Vann
. A. Factual Basis. ¶7 Vann alleges that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18739 - 2005-06-27
. A. Factual Basis. ¶7 Vann alleges that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18739 - 2005-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Sarah R.P.
that the juvenile court erred when it vacated a consent decree after the decree’s expiration date. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2890 - 2017-09-19
that the juvenile court erred when it vacated a consent decree after the decree’s expiration date. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2890 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was dropping the allegations.” She claimed “[h]er strong belief grew stronger again when the court indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115241 - 2017-09-21
was dropping the allegations.” She claimed “[h]er strong belief grew stronger again when the court indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
borrowers and guarantor Charles Neiss. The borrowers argue that the trial court erred by: (1) allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86090 - 2014-09-15
borrowers and guarantor Charles Neiss. The borrowers argue that the trial court erred by: (1) allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86090 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with the parties that the court erred by applying a twelve percent interest rate. We therefore reverse in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112662 - 2014-05-19
with the parties that the court erred by applying a twelve percent interest rate. We therefore reverse in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112662 - 2014-05-19
[PDF]
Alan J. Sapko v. Commercial Union Midwest Insurance Company
contends that the trial court erred in changing the jury’s answer to question four. We agree with both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2981 - 2017-09-19
contends that the trial court erred in changing the jury’s answer to question four. We agree with both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2981 - 2017-09-19
Bruce Gebhart v. Green Lake County
owners’ first argument is that the trial court “erred” in concluding that they failed to rebut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26557 - 2006-09-26
owners’ first argument is that the trial court “erred” in concluding that they failed to rebut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26557 - 2006-09-26