Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7861 - 7870 of 49819 for our.
Search results 7861 - 7870 of 49819 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733540 - 2023-11-28
report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733540 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP55-CRNM 2 response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246992 - 2019-09-16
. No. 2019AP55-CRNM 2 response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246992 - 2019-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intentional homicide. Wilson filed a response challenging his sentence as “harsh.” Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214798 - 2018-06-26
intentional homicide. Wilson filed a response challenging his sentence as “harsh.” Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214798 - 2018-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Dannie Thomas
to it. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. NO. 97-2069-CR-NM 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12758 - 2017-09-21
to it. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. NO. 97-2069-CR-NM 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12758 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and concludes that there is no issue of arguable merit. Our independent review of the record reveals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248633 - 2019-10-10
and concludes that there is no issue of arguable merit. Our independent review of the record reveals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248633 - 2019-10-10
CA Blank Order
. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110340 - 2014-04-15
. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110340 - 2014-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
)4. [1] Brian E. Davis’s notice of appeal before this court recites that it seeks our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
)4. [1] Brian E. Davis’s notice of appeal before this court recites that it seeks our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
State v. Richard L. Hackett
and his friend lied about the charges. Based upon our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8763 - 2005-03-31
and his friend lied about the charges. Based upon our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8763 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110322 - 2014-04-14
an order denying his motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110322 - 2014-04-14