Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7861 - 7870 of 50071 for our.
Search results 7861 - 7870 of 50071 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
the telephonic affidavit in our review of the affidavit. The officer stated that Applewhite admitted after his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58626 - 2011-01-05
the telephonic affidavit in our review of the affidavit. The officer stated that Applewhite admitted after his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58626 - 2011-01-05
State v. Beyan K. Stanley
of his right to file a response. Stanley has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13935 - 2005-03-31
of his right to file a response. Stanley has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13935 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105819 - 2017-09-21
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105819 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194323 - 2017-09-21
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194323 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96748 - 2014-09-15
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96748 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110322 - 2017-09-21
, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110322 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96337 - 2013-05-06
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96337 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144922 - 2017-09-21
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to overturn a judgment of conviction from 2013. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697383 - 2023-08-31
to overturn a judgment of conviction from 2013. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697383 - 2023-08-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to overturn a judgment of conviction from 2013. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697383 - 2023-08-31
to overturn a judgment of conviction from 2013. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697383 - 2023-08-31