Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7871 - 7880 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7871 - 7880 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
2007 WI APP 222
of value. Interpretation of this statute, as with others, is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30332 - 2007-10-30
of value. Interpretation of this statute, as with others, is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30332 - 2007-10-30
[PDF]
Domenick Tirabassi v. Richard Decker
a grant of summary judgment raises an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11745 - 2017-09-20
a grant of summary judgment raises an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11745 - 2017-09-20
State v. Mark A. Sturm
justifying police to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
justifying police to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
William P. Fischer v. Andray A. Zhurbas
of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15071 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15071 - 2005-03-31
Alvar Larson v. City of Elkhorn
judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. See M&I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2326 - 2005-03-31
judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. See M&I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2326 - 2005-03-31
State v. D.L.S.
was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. Lastly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6126 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. Lastly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6126 - 2005-03-31
Victor Salbashian v. David C. Matzke
N.W.2d 31, 34 (Ct. App. 1997). Review is de novo. See id. The interpretation and application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14275 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 31, 34 (Ct. App. 1997). Review is de novo. See id. The interpretation and application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14275 - 2005-03-31
Sally R. Dix v. John Patrick Styer
. This issue requires the application of a set of facts to a statutory standard, a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11708 - 2005-03-31
. This issue requires the application of a set of facts to a statutory standard, a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11708 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the existence of other innocent inferences that could be drawn.” Id. ¶7 I review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143249 - 2015-06-17
the existence of other innocent inferences that could be drawn.” Id. ¶7 I review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143249 - 2015-06-17
State v. Robert M. Hipke
an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to our de novo review. Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7604 - 2005-03-31
an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to our de novo review. Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7604 - 2005-03-31