Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7871 - 7880 of 12464 for mr.
Search results 7871 - 7880 of 12464 for mr.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be consecutive to any other sentence previously imposed, thus ensuring that Mr. Rodriguez receives punishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533541 - 2022-06-16
be consecutive to any other sentence previously imposed, thus ensuring that Mr. Rodriguez receives punishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533541 - 2022-06-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
for the scheduled hearing, the circuit court stated: “Well, Mr. Parise, I certainly understand you found yourself
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95747 - 2014-09-15
for the scheduled hearing, the circuit court stated: “Well, Mr. Parise, I certainly understand you found yourself
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95747 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
allow a trial in a case where Mr. Huck is charged with essentially nineteen counts … to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
allow a trial in a case where Mr. Huck is charged with essentially nineteen counts … to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
State v. Justin David Schwartz
been paid by Mr. Schwartz.” ¶6 The court proceeded to sentence Schwartz to a six-month jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7220 - 2005-03-31
been paid by Mr. Schwartz.” ¶6 The court proceeded to sentence Schwartz to a six-month jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Buckett
at sentencing as reminiscent of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The trial court was required to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8020 - 2017-09-19
at sentencing as reminiscent of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The trial court was required to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8020 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Court did not, as a matter of law, establish there was a substantial risk that Mr. Higgins would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273087 - 2020-07-28
Court did not, as a matter of law, establish there was a substantial risk that Mr. Higgins would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273087 - 2020-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
believe Mr. Cooper or not.” American Family also states in its brief, “As the trial court indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32016 - 2008-03-05
believe Mr. Cooper or not.” American Family also states in its brief, “As the trial court indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32016 - 2008-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The court noted that Washington “was a willing participant” in the robbery who “struck Mr. Bohannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34136 - 2008-09-29
.” The court noted that Washington “was a willing participant” in the robbery who “struck Mr. Bohannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34136 - 2008-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inquiry into whether Mr. Green improperly refused the chemical test.” Absent such a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921333 - 2025-03-05
inquiry into whether Mr. Green improperly refused the chemical test.” Absent such a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921333 - 2025-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
Buckner’s character. “[The trial court was] sorry for … Mr. Buckner. [The trial court was] sorry for what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09
Buckner’s character. “[The trial court was] sorry for … Mr. Buckner. [The trial court was] sorry for what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09