Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7871 - 7880 of 16226 for search.
Search results 7871 - 7880 of 16226 for search.
City of Sun Prairie v. William D. Davis
and the defendant’s authority immediately available. b. It enhances the search for the truth. During trials
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17275 - 2005-03-31
and the defendant’s authority immediately available. b. It enhances the search for the truth. During trials
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17275 - 2005-03-31
WI App 104 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1852-CR Complete Titl...
then signed two forms: A Consent to Search form which was altered to provide for a search of Jacobs’ blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85613 - 2012-09-26
then signed two forms: A Consent to Search form which was altered to provide for a search of Jacobs’ blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85613 - 2012-09-26
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
Search” exception to the Fourth Amendment. Whether the “Good Faith Exception” to the exclusionary
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036485 - 2025-11-07
Search” exception to the Fourth Amendment. Whether the “Good Faith Exception” to the exclusionary
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036485 - 2025-11-07
State v. Raphael C. Calhoun
by an undercover detective, went to 3288 North 25th Street in Milwaukee in search of a man who had just sold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2999 - 2005-03-31
by an undercover detective, went to 3288 North 25th Street in Milwaukee in search of a man who had just sold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2999 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of property seized. (1) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80626 - 2014-09-15
of property seized. (1) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80626 - 2014-09-15
State v. Nathaniel Wondergem
-A. Officer Peters proceeded to 1280-A, asked Wondergem’s suitemate for consent to search the closet, obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13739 - 2005-03-31
-A. Officer Peters proceeded to 1280-A, asked Wondergem’s suitemate for consent to search the closet, obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13739 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and his passenger were then placed in handcuffs. Based on the syringe, the officers decided to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473753 - 2022-01-19
and his passenger were then placed in handcuffs. Based on the syringe, the officers decided to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473753 - 2022-01-19
State v. Terrell A. Coleman
” search warrant. One of the officers testified that to execute the “no knock” search warrant, they “had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8859 - 2005-03-31
” search warrant. One of the officers testified that to execute the “no knock” search warrant, they “had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8859 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
of a search warrant. Accordingly, we conclude that probable cause did exist to draw the sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10113 - 2005-03-31
of a search warrant. Accordingly, we conclude that probable cause did exist to draw the sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terrell A. Coleman
by robbers but by uniformed Milwaukee County deputy sheriffs executing a “no knock” search warrant. One
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8859 - 2017-09-19
by robbers but by uniformed Milwaukee County deputy sheriffs executing a “no knock” search warrant. One
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8859 - 2017-09-19