Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78741 - 78750 of 87653 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 78741 - 78750 of 87653 for affidavit of filing.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denied the motion as untimely under WIS. STAT. ยง 805.17(3) because the motion was filed more than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238827 - 2019-04-08
denied the motion as untimely under WIS. STAT. ยง 805.17(3) because the motion was filed more than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238827 - 2019-04-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Seidl, JJ. Counsel for Paul Rice has filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151847 - 2017-09-21
and Seidl, JJ. Counsel for Paul Rice has filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151847 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
AP001242 CR State v. John Earl Mannery
. Before Brash, Chm., Dugan, Lazar, Stark, and Nashold, JJ., Publication Committee. The court having filed
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674952 - 2023-06-27
. Before Brash, Chm., Dugan, Lazar, Stark, and Nashold, JJ., Publication Committee. The court having filed
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674952 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for Chris Lincks, has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2017-18)1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279361 - 2020-08-18
for Chris Lincks, has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2017-18)1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279361 - 2020-08-18
State v. James P. Majury
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11136 - 2005-03-31
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James A. Loukota v. James P. Murphy
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10986 - 2017-09-19
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10986 - 2017-09-19
State v. Derrick Stewart
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED JULY 29, 1997 NOTICE A party may file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11970 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED JULY 29, 1997 NOTICE A party may file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11970 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wisconsin RSA #7 General Partner, Inc. v. United States Cellular Corporation
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8068 - 2017-09-19
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8068 - 2017-09-19
Bristol Veterinary Service v. William Schmidt
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9418 - 2005-03-31
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9418 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David E. Verhagen
, Verhagen filed a timely request for substitution of judge against Judge Foster, and the matter
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8206 - 2017-09-19
, Verhagen filed a timely request for substitution of judge against Judge Foster, and the matter
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8206 - 2017-09-19