Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78761 - 78770 of 83765 for simple case search.
Search results 78761 - 78770 of 83765 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
applied in this case. ¶9 For these reasons, Williams’s motion to vacate the DNA surcharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2011-03-28
applied in this case. ¶9 For these reasons, Williams’s motion to vacate the DNA surcharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
State v. Darnial C. Craig
In this case, defense counsel testified that he did not ask for the accomplice instruction because he felt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2860 - 2017-09-19
In this case, defense counsel testified that he did not ask for the accomplice instruction because he felt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2860 - 2017-09-19
State v. Barry Bartle
as to deprive [Bartle] of the credit, that sentence credit, and the court certainly didn't do that in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11513 - 2005-03-31
as to deprive [Bartle] of the credit, that sentence credit, and the court certainly didn't do that in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11513 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773400 - 2024-03-07
and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773400 - 2024-03-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
application.” Nickel, 2010 WI App 161, ¶8. Thus, Cherry cannot be retroactively applied in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59174 - 2014-09-15
application.” Nickel, 2010 WI App 161, ¶8. Thus, Cherry cannot be retroactively applied in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59174 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jamie R. Miller
not made the showing required by the case law governing access to confidential records. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12911 - 2005-03-31
not made the showing required by the case law governing access to confidential records. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12911 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
difference between this case and Northland, Campbell, and Wisconsin River is that the property owner here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47127 - 2010-02-16
difference between this case and Northland, Campbell, and Wisconsin River is that the property owner here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47127 - 2010-02-16
[PDF]
State v. Keith Edward Cooper
result if his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea was denied. In neither case did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8217 - 2017-09-19
result if his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea was denied. In neither case did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8217 - 2017-09-19
Verlin Anderson v. Curt Forde
of the issues, Forde also claims that Anderson’s case should have been dismissed because Anderson failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19408 - 2005-08-24
of the issues, Forde also claims that Anderson’s case should have been dismissed because Anderson failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19408 - 2005-08-24
Daniel M. Boss v. Robert J. Koch
. The case was commenced by the Bosses, who sought to recover unpaid rent, but only the Kochs’ counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14161 - 2005-03-31
. The case was commenced by the Bosses, who sought to recover unpaid rent, but only the Kochs’ counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14161 - 2005-03-31