Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7881 - 7890 of 16507 for commenting.
Search results 7881 - 7890 of 16507 for commenting.
COURT OF APPEALS
felon” comment at the custody hearing, nor does he cite any statements by the court at the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95261 - 2013-04-10
felon” comment at the custody hearing, nor does he cite any statements by the court at the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95261 - 2013-04-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
. This makes the situation much more serious than the mere “erratic driving” comment by the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35791 - 2014-09-15
. This makes the situation much more serious than the mere “erratic driving” comment by the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35791 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. A. David McCormack
no promise of leniency and made no threats or coercive comments. The officers complied with McCormack's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8192 - 2017-09-19
no promise of leniency and made no threats or coercive comments. The officers complied with McCormack's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8192 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that actually occurred. ¶9 In addition, Weathers argues that the officer’s comment is the functional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27317 - 2014-09-15
that actually occurred. ¶9 In addition, Weathers argues that the officer’s comment is the functional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27317 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jeffrey W. Wiseman v. Gary R. McCaughtry
that Wiseman’s remark, “You go get in one of them,” in response to the charging officer’s comment, met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11261 - 2017-09-19
that Wiseman’s remark, “You go get in one of them,” in response to the charging officer’s comment, met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11261 - 2017-09-19
Gary C. Sukowatey v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
without commenting on the board’s other reasons. See id. We conclude that the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15759 - 2005-03-31
without commenting on the board’s other reasons. See id. We conclude that the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15759 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
sentencing comments and our deference to the trial court, see id. at 183, we cannot conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97439 - 2013-05-28
sentencing comments and our deference to the trial court, see id. at 183, we cannot conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97439 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court’s sentencing comments were clear that, though it did not know whether the allegations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535273 - 2022-06-22
, the circuit court’s sentencing comments were clear that, though it did not know whether the allegations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535273 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the CUP, these summarized comments certainly provide no insight into why he moved and voted in favor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617296 - 2023-02-01
of the CUP, these summarized comments certainly provide no insight into why he moved and voted in favor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617296 - 2023-02-01
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Edward F.W.
about the incident involving Maltbey until Edward testified. Further, as the court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2623 - 2017-09-19
about the incident involving Maltbey until Edward testified. Further, as the court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2623 - 2017-09-19