Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7881 - 7890 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7881 - 7890 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and seizure satisfies constitutional standards is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 336
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84134 - 2014-09-15
and seizure satisfies constitutional standards is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 336
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84134 - 2014-09-15
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
are undisputed, as they are in this case, our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14461 - 2005-03-31
are undisputed, as they are in this case, our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14461 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark G. Bargenquast
review a probable cause determination de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14543 - 2005-03-31
review a probable cause determination de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14543 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary Jane M. v. Milwaukee County
to dismiss for failure to state a claim is a question of law, which the court reviews de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3202 - 2017-09-19
to dismiss for failure to state a claim is a question of law, which the court reviews de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
in the trial court’s decision on his postconviction motion. However, our review is de novo, id. at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5997 - 2017-09-19
in the trial court’s decision on his postconviction motion. However, our review is de novo, id. at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5997 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Patton, 2006 WI App 235, ¶7, 297 Wis. 2d 415, 724 N.W.2d 347. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51937 - 2010-07-13
. State v. Patton, 2006 WI App 235, ¶7, 297 Wis. 2d 415, 724 N.W.2d 347. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51937 - 2010-07-13
State v. James A. Albright
satisfy the statutory standard of probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4382 - 2005-03-31
satisfy the statutory standard of probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4382 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Whether the jury was properly instructed is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
. Whether the jury was properly instructed is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
State v. Toby J. Vandenberg
of counsel is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13503 - 2005-03-31
of counsel is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13503 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102956 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102956 - 2017-09-21