Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7881 - 7890 of 68485 for did.
Search results 7881 - 7890 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained by consent and did not taint the warrant. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205204 - 2017-12-14
obtained by consent and did not taint the warrant. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205204 - 2017-12-14
[PDF]
Holly R. v. Joseph T.
court erred in terminating his parental rights because he did not consent to the termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2663 - 2017-09-19
court erred in terminating his parental rights because he did not consent to the termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2663 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
but did not first secure a search warrant. Because the police did not use the proper process
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213416 - 2018-05-23
but did not first secure a search warrant. Because the police did not use the proper process
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213416 - 2018-05-23
State v. Steven L. Harris
the effective assistance of trial counsel because counsel did not object to the escape instruction and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20351 - 2005-11-22
the effective assistance of trial counsel because counsel did not object to the escape instruction and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20351 - 2005-11-22
State v. Roger H. Splitt
statute, and therefore the sentence must be vacated. We conclude that Splitt did not receive ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3073 - 2005-03-31
statute, and therefore the sentence must be vacated. We conclude that Splitt did not receive ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3073 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mylea Wirkus
for a blood test. Wirkus did not respond to Gudex’s request that she take a breath test, but instead referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21671 - 2006-03-07
for a blood test. Wirkus did not respond to Gudex’s request that she take a breath test, but instead referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21671 - 2006-03-07
State v. David Allen Bruski
claimed he did not. Bruski later indicated he knew Smith’s daughter but could only give her first name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21227 - 2006-03-22
claimed he did not. Bruski later indicated he knew Smith’s daughter but could only give her first name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21227 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the subsequently obtained blood draw must be suppressed. Because we conclude the deputy did have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
of the subsequently obtained blood draw must be suppressed. Because we conclude the deputy did have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
[PDF]
City of Two Rivers v. Thomas J. Lavey
on the premises. Lavey, however, testified that he did not intend to advertise on behalf of Sunkist oranges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7925 - 2017-09-19
on the premises. Lavey, however, testified that he did not intend to advertise on behalf of Sunkist oranges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7925 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Two Rivers v. Thomas J. Lavey
on the premises. Lavey, however, testified that he did not intend to advertise on behalf of Sunkist oranges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7926 - 2017-09-19
on the premises. Lavey, however, testified that he did not intend to advertise on behalf of Sunkist oranges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7926 - 2017-09-19