Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7881 - 7890 of 74479 for public records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
no citation to the record. We admonish Hoeft that WIS. STAT. RULE § 809.19(1)(d) and (e) requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143523 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
not ‘take’ a person’s private property for public use without providing just compensation.” Fromm v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143523 - 2015-06-24

[PDF] WI App 22
Fassett dedicate part of her property for a new public through street and pay to construct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511962 - 2022-06-08

Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
that MMSD's discharge permit be modified. Pursuant to § 147.13, Stats., a public informational hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8002 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
. Pursuant to § 147.13, STATS., a public informational hearing was held and the DNR modified MMSD's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8002 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by the Village of Slinger at Polk’s request in 2006. Polk also recorded a restrictive covenant limiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243323 - 2019-07-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is considered a public or non-public figure. See Denny v. Mertz, 106 Wis. 2d 636, 643-46, 651-52, 318 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347323 - 2021-03-18

COURT OF APPEALS
of $45,000 to $50,000.” Although no specific dollar amount is provided in the record, VCY represents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31288 - 2007-12-26

[PDF] NOTICE
no specific dollar amount is provided in the record, VCY represents that its bookstore does not generate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31288 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
the BOA correctly applied the law, the record supports its decision, and the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16099 - 2017-09-21