Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7881 - 7890 of 18714 for quote.
Search results 7881 - 7890 of 18714 for quote.
State v. Joseph L. Van Patten
at 54 (quoting Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985)). The standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11600 - 2005-03-31
at 54 (quoting Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985)). The standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
*This opinion was circulated and approved before Judge Wedemeyer's death.
. Possession “‘means that the defendant knowingly had actual physical control of a firearm.’” Ibid. (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33522 - 2014-09-15
. Possession “‘means that the defendant knowingly had actual physical control of a firearm.’” Ibid. (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33522 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. Barber
Wis. 2d 442, 650 N.W.2d 873 (quoting State v. Leonard, 39 Wis. 2d 461, 473, 159 N.W.2d 577 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4992 - 2017-09-19
Wis. 2d 442, 650 N.W.2d 873 (quoting State v. Leonard, 39 Wis. 2d 461, 473, 159 N.W.2d 577 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4992 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to particular testimony (quoted source omitted)); Noll v. Dimiceli’s, Inc., 115 Wis. 2d 641, 643-44, 340 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209478 - 2018-03-08
to particular testimony (quoted source omitted)); Noll v. Dimiceli’s, Inc., 115 Wis. 2d 641, 643-44, 340 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209478 - 2018-03-08
[PDF]
State v. Rose Marie Hartfield
exercised and the basis of that exercise of discretion [is] set forth.’” Id., ¶76 (quoting McCleary, 49
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25063 - 2017-09-21
exercised and the basis of that exercise of discretion [is] set forth.’” Id., ¶76 (quoting McCleary, 49
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25063 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the above quoted zoning provisions. She testified that the building permit was denied because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86044 - 2014-09-15
the above quoted zoning provisions. She testified that the building permit was denied because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86044 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark H. Brooks
police illegality as required by Bermudez, 221 Wis.2d at 352, 585 N.W.2d at 634 (quoting State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15799 - 2017-09-21
police illegality as required by Bermudez, 221 Wis.2d at 352, 585 N.W.2d at 634 (quoting State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Cindy Dykema v. Lorney J. Bendel
with, does not constitute proof of mailing. Id. at 616, 277 N.W. at 645 (quoting Federal Asbestos Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8903 - 2017-09-19
with, does not constitute proof of mailing. Id. at 616, 277 N.W. at 645 (quoting Federal Asbestos Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8903 - 2017-09-19
Thomas F. Woods v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company
is not that for which the damaged person bargained. Id. at 264-65, 371 N.W.2d at 394 (emphasis added) (quoting Weedo v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11131 - 2005-03-31
is not that for which the damaged person bargained. Id. at 264-65, 371 N.W.2d at 394 (emphasis added) (quoting Weedo v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11131 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[the] judgment in his [or her] favor”) (quoted source omitted). Because Strelchenko was acquitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184646 - 2017-09-21
[the] judgment in his [or her] favor”) (quoted source omitted). Because Strelchenko was acquitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184646 - 2017-09-21