Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7891 - 7900 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7891 - 7900 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
State v. Ruth Woodring
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10581 - 2005-03-31
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10581 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gerald L. Larson
or her burden is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶5 Shiffra, 175 Wis. 2d at 605
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18500 - 2005-06-14
or her burden is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶5 Shiffra, 175 Wis. 2d at 605
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18500 - 2005-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Jones, 2002 WI App 208, ¶8, 257 Wis. 2d 163, 650 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865741 - 2024-10-23
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Jones, 2002 WI App 208, ¶8, 257 Wis. 2d 163, 650 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865741 - 2024-10-23
Trisha M. Liethen v. Stephen W. Allen
judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25343 - 2006-05-30
judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25343 - 2006-05-30
State v. Ralph E. Peat
requirements is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Kasian, 207 Wis.2d 611, 621, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13141 - 2005-03-31
requirements is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Kasian, 207 Wis.2d 611, 621, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13141 - 2005-03-31
Julia K. Wleklinski v. Trostel
] Whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is a question that this court decides de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2613 - 2005-03-31
] Whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is a question that this court decides de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2613 - 2005-03-31
Sally R. Dix v. John Patrick Styer
. This issue requires the application of a set of facts to a statutory standard, a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11708 - 2005-03-31
. This issue requires the application of a set of facts to a statutory standard, a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11708 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 Where, as here, a police officer is acting upon an observation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111385 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 Where, as here, a police officer is acting upon an observation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111385 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Elizabeth Schultz v. William Kelly
to the legal standard for unjust enrichment, however, presents a question of law we review de novo. Waage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13066 - 2017-09-21
to the legal standard for unjust enrichment, however, presents a question of law we review de novo. Waage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13066 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 755.045(1) in the context of existing case law. This presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48251 - 2014-09-15
. § 755.045(1) in the context of existing case law. This presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48251 - 2014-09-15