Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7891 - 7900 of 68276 for did.
Search results 7891 - 7900 of 68276 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
sample, Smith told Sutherland that he did not think he should take the test. Sutherland advised Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28923 - 2007-05-07
sample, Smith told Sutherland that he did not think he should take the test. Sutherland advised Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28923 - 2007-05-07
State v. Herbert W. McGee
that the evidence shows that the witnesses did not see the person who fired the shotgun, but that they agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12222 - 2005-03-31
that the evidence shows that the witnesses did not see the person who fired the shotgun, but that they agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12222 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the voice on the recording did not sound like Walker, and that if Attorney Westrick had allowed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55693 - 2007-02-12
that the voice on the recording did not sound like Walker, and that if Attorney Westrick had allowed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55693 - 2007-02-12
State v. Mylea Wirkus
for a blood test. Wirkus did not respond to Gudex’s request that she take a breath test, but instead referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21671 - 2006-03-07
for a blood test. Wirkus did not respond to Gudex’s request that she take a breath test, but instead referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21671 - 2006-03-07
Jeanne G. Frawley v. Edward L. Frawley
challenges the business valuation on two grounds. First, she argues that the circuit court did not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6911 - 2005-03-31
challenges the business valuation on two grounds. First, she argues that the circuit court did not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6911 - 2005-03-31
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
., dissents (opinion filed). BRADLEY, J., joins dissent. Not Participating: SYKES, J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16657 - 2005-03-31
., dissents (opinion filed). BRADLEY, J., joins dissent. Not Participating: SYKES, J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16657 - 2005-03-31
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
., dissents (opinion filed). BRADLEY, J., joins dissent. Not Participating: SYKES, J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16658 - 2005-03-31
., dissents (opinion filed). BRADLEY, J., joins dissent. Not Participating: SYKES, J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16658 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
HAGEDORN, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant-petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266933 - 2020-08-28
HAGEDORN, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant-petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266933 - 2020-08-28
Frontsheet
: Not Participating: BUTLER, JR., J., did not participate. Attorneys: For the defendants-co-appellants-cross
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33183 - 2008-06-24
: Not Participating: BUTLER, JR., J., did not participate. Attorneys: For the defendants-co-appellants-cross
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33183 - 2008-06-24
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
., dissents (opinion filed). BRADLEY, J., joins dissent. Not Participating: SYKES, J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16659 - 2005-03-31
., dissents (opinion filed). BRADLEY, J., joins dissent. Not Participating: SYKES, J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16659 - 2005-03-31