Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7891 - 7900 of 20931 for word.

[PDF] EAST STATE CAPITOL
. If possible, e-mail a Microsoft Word version of your response to carrie.janto@wicourts.gov or clerk
/supreme/docs/1201publicletter.pdf - 2012-02-08

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 12-10 - Interested person communication
. Box 1688, Madison, WI 53701- 1688. If possible, e-mail a Microsoft Word version of your response
/supreme/docs/1210publicletter.pdf - 2012-10-18

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 21-03 - Interested persons communication
, Madison, WI 53701-1688. If Rule No. 21-03 Page 2 possible, email a Microsoft Word
/supreme/docs/2103intpers.pdf - 2021-12-03

[PDF] Comments on Supreme Court rule 17-01 - Interested persons communication
. If possible, email a Microsoft Rule No. 17-01 Page 2 Word version of your response to clerk
/supreme/docs/1701intpers.pdf - 2017-03-21

[PDF] 2021AP001450 - Response of Citizen Mathematicians to Motion for Relief from Judgment (01-29-24)
for alternate formatting. The length of this Response is 489 words. Dated: January 29, 2024. eb“dt at Sarah
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924mathresponse.pdf - 2024-01-30

[PDF] 2025AP002121 - 2025-12-03 Court Order
it. Any proposed non-party brief shall not exceed 20 pages if a monospaced font is used or 4,400 words
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/25ap2121_1203order.pdf - 2025-12-03

State v. James P.
19, ¶12, 269 Wis. 2d 526, 537–538, 674 N.W.2d 922, 928 (legislature presumed to use words according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7381 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
(citation omitted). In other words, we have already ruled in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12275 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kevin L. Guibord
for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions ...." "In other words, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10360 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Linda T. Sobish
an injury.” WIS. STAT. § 940.06(2). In other words, the evidence was such that the jury could find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3237 - 2017-09-19