Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78921 - 78930 of 84350 for simple case search.
Search results 78921 - 78930 of 84350 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the crime. The case initially proceeded to a jury trial; however, the matter was ultimately resolved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1111233 - 2026-04-28
to the crime. The case initially proceeded to a jury trial; however, the matter was ultimately resolved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1111233 - 2026-04-28
State v. Richard Stensvad
the dangerousness standard confirmed by the Randall court. We disagree. The trial court in this case undertook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7699 - 2005-03-31
the dangerousness standard confirmed by the Randall court. We disagree. The trial court in this case undertook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7699 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Charles R. Lutz v. Washburn County
easement includes the right to park vehicles. We affirm the judgment. This case involves a dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13471 - 2017-09-21
easement includes the right to park vehicles. We affirm the judgment. This case involves a dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13471 - 2017-09-21
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Samantha E.
, in this case because this court concludes this matter was waived by failure to make an objection at the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14127 - 2005-03-31
, in this case because this court concludes this matter was waived by failure to make an objection at the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14127 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian Misovy
Tennessee. We affirm. 1. The criminal complaint in this case charged Misovy with driving his car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12777 - 2017-09-21
Tennessee. We affirm. 1. The criminal complaint in this case charged Misovy with driving his car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12777 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
___, ___. Thus, the circuit court correctly determined that Cherry cannot be applied retroactively to this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60547 - 2014-09-15
___, ___. Thus, the circuit court correctly determined that Cherry cannot be applied retroactively to this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60547 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Gordon might have confused this case with another. He also focused on the State’s failure to call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98334 - 2014-09-15
that Gordon might have confused this case with another. He also focused on the State’s failure to call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98334 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark Anthony Adell v. Matthew A. Frank
that the decision in this case has the effect of rewriting the relevant rules so as to say the inmate “shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19634 - 2017-09-21
that the decision in this case has the effect of rewriting the relevant rules so as to say the inmate “shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19634 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The text messages Fields alleges in this case are not “apparently exculpatory” for several reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68987 - 2014-09-15
The text messages Fields alleges in this case are not “apparently exculpatory” for several reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68987 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Bryan K. Heckman
was performed within the mandatory three-hour period. Consequently, we affirm. This case arose out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11134 - 2017-09-19
was performed within the mandatory three-hour period. Consequently, we affirm. This case arose out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11134 - 2017-09-19