Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7901 - 7910 of 76983 for search which.
Search results 7901 - 7910 of 76983 for search which.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the Fenners had “the right to the use of the private driveway as now used, which said driveway extends from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31234 - 2007-12-18
that the Fenners had “the right to the use of the private driveway as now used, which said driveway extends from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31234 - 2007-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Haas
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15953 - 2017-09-21
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15953 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15953 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15953 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15954 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15954 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carlos Perez
court for the county in which the property was seized or where the search warrant was returned
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17572 - 2005-03-31
court for the county in which the property was seized or where the search warrant was returned
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17572 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Perez
return to the circuit court for the county in which the property was seized or where the search warrant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17572 - 2017-09-21
return to the circuit court for the county in which the property was seized or where the search warrant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17572 - 2017-09-21
State v. Raymond Massie
. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and the order. Massie was present when a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13922 - 2005-03-31
. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and the order. Massie was present when a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13922 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
JD-1745 Dispositional Order (Delinquent)
No. A Petition has been filed with the court. This dispositional hearing was held on [Date] , which
/formdisplay/JD-1745.pdf?formNumber=JD-1745&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-07-10
No. A Petition has been filed with the court. This dispositional hearing was held on [Date] , which
/formdisplay/JD-1745.pdf?formNumber=JD-1745&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-07-10
[PDF]
State v. Carl Simonetto
executed a search warrant at Simonetto’s residence and seized videotapes and Simonetto’s computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15166 - 2017-09-21
executed a search warrant at Simonetto’s residence and seized videotapes and Simonetto’s computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15166 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 officer lacked the requisite reasonable suspicion to initiate a stop of the vehicle in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38153 - 2014-09-15
2 officer lacked the requisite reasonable suspicion to initiate a stop of the vehicle in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38153 - 2014-09-15