Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7911 - 7920 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 7911 - 7920 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Milwaukee County v. Theodore S.
, 130 (Ct. App. 1992). Neither Louise M. nor Theodore S. are now in custody. Thus, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8578 - 2005-03-31
, 130 (Ct. App. 1992). Neither Louise M. nor Theodore S. are now in custody. Thus, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8578 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
contractor assessor for the collection, maintenance, and custody of its property assessment records
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33183 - 2008-06-24
contractor assessor for the collection, maintenance, and custody of its property assessment records
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33183 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
placement with Sara. Martin was invited to file a motion to amend the temporary order with the family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34201 - 2014-09-15
placement with Sara. Martin was invited to file a motion to amend the temporary order with the family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34201 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
placement with Sara. Martin was invited to file a motion to amend the temporary order with the family court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34201 - 2008-10-06
placement with Sara. Martin was invited to file a motion to amend the temporary order with the family court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34201 - 2008-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
. STAT. RULE 809.30. A motion is timely under § 974.06 so long as the defendant is still in custody.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15669 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. RULE 809.30. A motion is timely under § 974.06 so long as the defendant is still in custody.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
errors of judgment as to law or fact.” Joint Sch. Dist. No. 10 v. Jefferson Educ. Ass’n, 78 Wis. 2d 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682971 - 2023-07-25
errors of judgment as to law or fact.” Joint Sch. Dist. No. 10 v. Jefferson Educ. Ass’n, 78 Wis. 2d 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682971 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
WI 76
and M.F. were engaged to be married. In December of that year they opened a joint checking account
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68056 - 2014-09-15
and M.F. were engaged to be married. In December of that year they opened a joint checking account
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68056 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Hawazen Establishment v. Town of Linn
, those matters were reviewed in a joint session before the combined boards of review as constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8352 - 2017-09-19
, those matters were reviewed in a joint session before the combined boards of review as constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8352 - 2017-09-19
Hawazen Establishment v. Town of Linn
assessment.[4] On August 18, 1992, the board of review met in joint session to address Hawazen's objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8352 - 2005-03-31
assessment.[4] On August 18, 1992, the board of review met in joint session to address Hawazen's objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8352 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
were in custody when the motion hearing was held. ¶8 The trial court issued its decision from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27844 - 2007-01-22
were in custody when the motion hearing was held. ¶8 The trial court issued its decision from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27844 - 2007-01-22