Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7911 - 7920 of 69367 for as he.
Search results 7911 - 7920 of 69367 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Jones initially admitted that he wielded the hammer and acted on instructions from Sellers. Later
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194955 - 2017-09-21
Jones initially admitted that he wielded the hammer and acted on instructions from Sellers. Later
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194955 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
battery, as a party to the crimes. He was sentenced to sixty years in prison. He appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
battery, as a party to the crimes. He was sentenced to sixty years in prison. He appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard C. Devereux
Devereux for a ride in his Jeep, and he agreed. He drove to a secluded area near his residence and asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10728 - 2005-03-31
Devereux for a ride in his Jeep, and he agreed. He drove to a secluded area near his residence and asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10728 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that he lived at the residence, and police took him into custody. ¶3 At the time of Smith’s arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120143 - 2014-08-25
that he lived at the residence, and police took him into custody. ¶3 At the time of Smith’s arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120143 - 2014-08-25
Andre Wingo v. David H. Schwarz
, pro se, from an order affirming the revocation of his probation. He claims that: (1) his due-process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7437 - 2005-03-31
, pro se, from an order affirming the revocation of his probation. He claims that: (1) his due-process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7437 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2009AP2907-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF350
told by his agent that he did not have to talk to police, he repeated his incriminating statements
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58252 - 2014-09-15
told by his agent that he did not have to talk to police, he repeated his incriminating statements
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58252 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing. He argues that he should be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192477 - 2017-09-21
was remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing. He argues that he should be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192477 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as a party to the crime. Falk was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760232 - 2024-02-06
, as a party to the crime. Falk was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760232 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for plea withdrawal, and an order denying his motion for reconsideration. Tarkenton contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663723 - 2023-06-02
for plea withdrawal, and an order denying his motion for reconsideration. Tarkenton contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663723 - 2023-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the incident. Starkman arrived at K.P’s house to get the children at around 7:00 p.m. at which time he saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181197 - 2017-09-21
the incident. Starkman arrived at K.P’s house to get the children at around 7:00 p.m. at which time he saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181197 - 2017-09-21