Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7911 - 7920 of 50071 for our.
Search results 7911 - 7920 of 50071 for our.
CA Blank Order
by denying his collateral attack of one of his prior countable offenses. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108908 - 2014-03-10
by denying his collateral attack of one of his prior countable offenses. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108908 - 2014-03-10
CA Blank Order
our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80, ¶23, 261 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125431 - 2014-10-27
our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80, ¶23, 261 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125431 - 2014-10-27
CA Blank Order
. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent review of the records, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93229 - 2013-02-19
. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent review of the records, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93229 - 2013-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also addresses whether a challenge to Eleby’s sentence would have arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293193 - 2020-10-01
also addresses whether a challenge to Eleby’s sentence would have arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293193 - 2020-10-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
impacted “the heart and integrity of our system.” We note that Beene’s intimidation had its intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56493 - 2014-09-15
impacted “the heart and integrity of our system.” We note that Beene’s intimidation had its intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56493 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Alice Howard v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
in a row. Based on our review of the administrative agency’s decision and the record, we reverse. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3449 - 2017-09-19
in a row. Based on our review of the administrative agency’s decision and the record, we reverse. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3449 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jason A. Krysheski
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11918 - 2017-09-21
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11918 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Joseph C. Athans appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94400 - 2013-03-26
. Joseph C. Athans appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94400 - 2013-03-26
Waukesha County v. Devlin D.D.
… is dismissal.” While we also conclude that dismissal was appropriate, we base our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13634 - 2005-03-31
… is dismissal.” While we also conclude that dismissal was appropriate, we base our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13634 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward A. Stoetzel
the facts and our holding, the good faith exception would not apply in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10830 - 2005-03-31
the facts and our holding, the good faith exception would not apply in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10830 - 2005-03-31