Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 79271 - 79280 of 87322 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 79271 - 79280 of 87322 for affidavit of filing.
CA Blank Order
(1965). Clausing did not file a reply brief that disputes that view of the statute, and therefore we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139857 - 2015-04-12
(1965). Clausing did not file a reply brief that disputes that view of the statute, and therefore we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139857 - 2015-04-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there were no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Petty subsequently filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502558 - 2022-04-06
that there were no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Petty subsequently filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502558 - 2022-04-06
[PDF]
AP001729 Michael R. Wilhelm v. McCoy Contractors Inc.
. The court having filed its opinion in each of the above-entitled appeals and the court having concluded
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228837 - 2018-11-28
. The court having filed its opinion in each of the above-entitled appeals and the court having concluded
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228837 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Isbell
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8185 - 2017-09-19
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8185 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
AP002128 CR State v. Travanti D. Schmidt
Committee. The court having filed its opinion in each of the above-entitled appeals and the court having
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=401956 - 2021-07-27
Committee. The court having filed its opinion in each of the above-entitled appeals and the court having
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=401956 - 2021-07-27
[PDF]
AP001674 State v. Randal G. Rosenthal, Jr.
, JJ., Publication Committee. The court having filed its opinion in each of the above-entitled appeals
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626635 - 2023-02-21
, JJ., Publication Committee. The court having filed its opinion in each of the above-entitled appeals
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626635 - 2023-02-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that an aggrieved party may obtain review of the circuit court’s new order on remand by filing a statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184120 - 2017-09-21
that an aggrieved party may obtain review of the circuit court’s new order on remand by filing a statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision, to run consecutive to the sentence Petroski was already serving. Petroski subsequently filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257785 - 2020-04-21
supervision, to run consecutive to the sentence Petroski was already serving. Petroski subsequently filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257785 - 2020-04-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
slip op. at 3. Therefore, we rejected Varellas’s double jeopardy claim. In 2014, Varellas filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159845 - 2017-09-21
slip op. at 3. Therefore, we rejected Varellas’s double jeopardy claim. In 2014, Varellas filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159845 - 2017-09-21
State v. John Klopotowski
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9608 - 2005-03-31
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9608 - 2005-03-31