Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 79321 - 79330 of 84213 for simple case search.
Search results 79321 - 79330 of 84213 for simple case search.
State v. Michael R.T.
argues that because his only conduct in this case was furnishing a bottle of unmarked pills to a fellow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14335 - 2005-03-31
argues that because his only conduct in this case was furnishing a bottle of unmarked pills to a fellow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
standard of review. Unlike this case, Michels Pipeline involved an appeal from an administrative agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50176 - 2014-09-15
standard of review. Unlike this case, Michels Pipeline involved an appeal from an administrative agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the appointment of counsel in criminal cases, where the defendant is later found to be nonindigent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50801 - 2014-09-15
for the appointment of counsel in criminal cases, where the defendant is later found to be nonindigent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50801 - 2014-09-15
State v. Arthur G. Ptack
affirmed that he had a chance to discuss in detail the facts of his case with counsel. The court directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12503 - 2005-03-31
affirmed that he had a chance to discuss in detail the facts of his case with counsel. The court directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12503 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Oakley
to pay child support. These cases support our conclusion that Oakley’s condition of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
to pay child support. These cases support our conclusion that Oakley’s condition of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20
[PDF]
Darlene A. Bartelt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
for the Blazer in case someone had to drive it in the summer. Kathy states Bonke told her it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7572 - 2017-09-19
for the Blazer in case someone had to drive it in the summer. Kathy states Bonke told her it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7572 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imprisonment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223844 - 2018-10-19
imprisonment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223844 - 2018-10-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the conduct” in this case. The circuit court has an additional opportunity to explain its sentence when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170362 - 2017-09-21
for the conduct” in this case. The circuit court has an additional opportunity to explain its sentence when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170362 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
). In that case, the defendant was pulled over for a noisy muffler, admitted to consuming three beers before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74247 - 2011-11-22
). In that case, the defendant was pulled over for a noisy muffler, admitted to consuming three beers before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74247 - 2011-11-22