Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7941 - 7950 of 72969 for petition.
Search results 7941 - 7950 of 72969 for petition.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Gillis’s petition. The court stated that if the petition had been based “solely on the Petitioner’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102068 - 2017-09-21
Gillis’s petition. The court stated that if the petition had been based “solely on the Petitioner’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102068 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas D. Champeau v. City of Milwaukee
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed IN RE THE RETURN OF PROPERTY: THOMAS D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4254 - 2017-09-19
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed IN RE THE RETURN OF PROPERTY: THOMAS D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4254 - 2017-09-19
Holly R. v. Joseph T.
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Holly R. v. Joseph T.
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2663 - 2017-09-19
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2663 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
thereafter; and (3) Brogle had deceived the petitioners and diverted or stole trust assets. The petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333141 - 2021-02-09
thereafter; and (3) Brogle had deceived the petitioners and diverted or stole trust assets. The petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333141 - 2021-02-09
CA Blank Order
to Petitioner’s petition shows a date when the sheet was prepared (in the upper right hand of the page
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102068 - 2013-09-16
to Petitioner’s petition shows a date when the sheet was prepared (in the upper right hand of the page
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102068 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Enders’s1 motion to quash Palm’s petition for a writ of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014859 - 2025-09-30
Enders’s1 motion to quash Palm’s petition for a writ of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014859 - 2025-09-30
State v. Patricia G.
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6515 - 2005-03-31
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6515 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
). The no-merit report addresses whether the State adhered to the statutory time limits, whether the petition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148255 - 2015-09-02
). The no-merit report addresses whether the State adhered to the statutory time limits, whether the petition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148255 - 2015-09-02
State v. Ronald Waites
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9966 - 2005-03-31
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9966 - 2005-03-31