Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7941 - 7950 of 12912 for prosecuting.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the State failed to prove that it had an important interest in prosecuting her, and that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058689 - 2026-01-06

State v. Dennis E. Jones
established Jones’s status as a repeat offender; that the prosecution did not withhold exculpatory evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24709 - 2006-04-04

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. M. Joanne Wolf
restructured. The name of the body responsible for investigating and prosecuting cases involving attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16436 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michele A. Tjader
restructuring. The name of the body responsible for investigating and prosecuting cases involving attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16433 - 2005-03-31

State v. Marjorie M. Veeser
in the ensuing prosecution. The infant’s cause of death was not released until well after the police had visited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5194 - 2005-03-31

State v. Patricia K.S.
that “[a] person convicted of crime may prosecute his writ of error while serving his sentence, and the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10638 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert P. Behm
to prosecution and punishment as a third-time OWI offender. This reliance, Behm contends, violates his due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13697 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that person exposes himself or herself to the threat of prosecution for making false statements. Id., ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80698 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jesse Ruiz
the other person does not consent…. “[W]hen the prosecution seeks to justify a warrantless search by proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Danny Prince Hall v. Gerald Berge
prosecution has a constitutional right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, no similar right exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13510 - 2017-09-21