Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7941 - 7950 of 74552 for public records.
Search results 7941 - 7950 of 74552 for public records.
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added January 2017 oral argument dates
seeking a declaratory judgment that the DOJ’s alias name policy violates Wisconsin’s public records
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177604 - 2017-09-21
seeking a declaratory judgment that the DOJ’s alias name policy violates Wisconsin’s public records
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with accurate record citations. ¶3 Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 32.06(7), the Town filed a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90099 - 2014-09-15
with accurate record citations. ¶3 Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 32.06(7), the Town filed a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90099 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
contrary to the intent of the shoreland zoning statutes and the public interest. Nevertheless, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
contrary to the intent of the shoreland zoning statutes and the public interest. Nevertheless, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176950 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176950 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102773 - 2017-09-21
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102773 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191924 - 2017-09-21
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191924 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050989 - 2025-12-17
and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050989 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050989 - 2025-12-17
and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050989 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140514 - 2017-09-21
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140514 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of the offenses; Moua’s character, including his prior record; and the need to protect the public. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98495 - 2013-06-24
of the offenses; Moua’s character, including his prior record; and the need to protect the public. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98495 - 2013-06-24