Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7951 - 7960 of 18714 for quote.
Search results 7951 - 7960 of 18714 for quote.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion of the stop.” Id., ¶10 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78740 - 2014-09-15
those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion of the stop.” Id., ¶10 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78740 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. LeRoy J. Dean, Jr.
. 1989) (quoting Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976)). At the postconviction motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14689 - 2017-09-21
. 1989) (quoting Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976)). At the postconviction motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14689 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Archie N. Johnson v. Denis L. Laurencin, M.D.
and where there is no “clear and justifiable excuse.” See Johnson, 162 Wis. 2d at 275 (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5092 - 2017-09-19
and where there is no “clear and justifiable excuse.” See Johnson, 162 Wis. 2d at 275 (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5092 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
(quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690). We “strongly presume” that counsel has rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30404 - 2014-09-15
(quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690). We “strongly presume” that counsel has rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30404 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
relationship to the opportunity to defend’”) (quoted source omitted). ¶10 The pretrial hearing concerned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30672 - 2014-09-15
relationship to the opportunity to defend’”) (quoted source omitted). ¶10 The pretrial hearing concerned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30672 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., ¶16 (quoting Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-17
is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., ¶16 (quoting Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as well as mail copies of the demand to the parties. Even the language that Ellis quotes refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125425 - 2017-09-21
, as well as mail copies of the demand to the parties. Even the language that Ellis quotes refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125425 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). A defendant therefore need demonstrate to the court only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
. (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). A defendant therefore need demonstrate to the court only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
507 (quoted sources omitted). That is particularly true given the read-in offense, which alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101616 - 2017-09-21
507 (quoted sources omitted). That is particularly true given the read-in offense, which alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101616 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that interest.” Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39, 45 (1984) (quoting Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62520 - 2011-04-12
that interest.” Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39, 45 (1984) (quoting Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62520 - 2011-04-12