Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7951 - 7960 of 63485 for records.
Search results 7951 - 7960 of 63485 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report, and the supplemental no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270931 - 2020-07-21
independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report, and the supplemental no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270931 - 2020-07-21
CA Blank Order
if he entered the plea. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and Crump’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102132 - 2013-09-16
if he entered the plea. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and Crump’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102132 - 2013-09-16
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113965 - 2014-06-10
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113965 - 2014-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729516 - 2023-11-16
and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729516 - 2023-11-16
Paul M. J. v. Dorene A. G.
is not supported by the evidence; and (5) it erroneously rejected psychological testimony. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9029 - 2005-03-31
is not supported by the evidence; and (5) it erroneously rejected psychological testimony. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Walter Strong v. Maryann Strong
-FT 2 § 806.07(1)(h).1 Because the record reflects a reasonable exercise of discretion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15974 - 2017-09-21
-FT 2 § 806.07(1)(h).1 Because the record reflects a reasonable exercise of discretion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15974 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mark Price v. Gary R. McCaughtry
to the record created before the committee. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis. 2d 226, 233, 461 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2675 - 2017-09-19
to the record created before the committee. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis. 2d 226, 233, 461 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2675 - 2017-09-19
Village of Fontana v. Gary M. Zamecnik
(1985). An appellate court will not find an erroneous exercise of discretion if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4602 - 2005-03-31
(1985). An appellate court will not find an erroneous exercise of discretion if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4602 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dave Burton
that procedural rules were not followed and there was no record that his urine specimen was refrigerated or frozen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2005-03-31
that procedural rules were not followed and there was no record that his urine specimen was refrigerated or frozen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
report, and we have independently reviewed the record. We conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122903 - 2014-09-28
report, and we have independently reviewed the record. We conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122903 - 2014-09-28