Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7971 - 7980 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 7971 - 7980 of 24568 for extending.
COURT OF APPEALS
. (a) and that it is likely that the child will continue to be placed with that person for an extended period of time or until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72894 - 2011-10-26
. (a) and that it is likely that the child will continue to be placed with that person for an extended period of time or until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72894 - 2011-10-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed. The no-merit report first considers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173912 - 2017-09-21
years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed. The no-merit report first considers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173912 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. Three concurrent terms of five years’ initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30295 - 2014-09-15
confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. Three concurrent terms of five years’ initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30295 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to eight years’ initial confinement and seven years’ extended supervision, with no eligibility for either
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149114 - 2017-09-21
to eight years’ initial confinement and seven years’ extended supervision, with no eligibility for either
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149114 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
and nine years’ extended supervision. The imposed sentence was stayed in favor of six years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
and nine years’ extended supervision. The imposed sentence was stayed in favor of six years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was a registered sex offender, was on extended supervision resulting from his 2012 conviction for a felony sex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357928 - 2021-04-20
was a registered sex offender, was on extended supervision resulting from his 2012 conviction for a felony sex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357928 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the no-merit report, dismiss the appeal without prejudice, and extend the deadline for filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234236 - 2019-02-04
the no-merit report, dismiss the appeal without prejudice, and extend the deadline for filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234236 - 2019-02-04
[PDF]
State v. Nadaniel P. Jones
6 urges us to assess whether the extended investigation was “reasonably related in scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21
6 urges us to assess whether the extended investigation was “reasonably related in scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
years of initial confinement and six and one-half years of extended supervision for the first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36196 - 2009-04-15
years of initial confinement and six and one-half years of extended supervision for the first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36196 - 2009-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. His conviction was based largely on the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66208 - 2014-09-15
’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. His conviction was based largely on the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66208 - 2014-09-15