Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7971 - 7980 of 58618 for speedy trial.
Search results 7971 - 7980 of 58618 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
guilt. We conclude that the trial court did not err by summarily denying his plea withdrawal motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35510 - 2009-02-09
guilt. We conclude that the trial court did not err by summarily denying his plea withdrawal motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35510 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the bathroom. The case proceeded to a bench trial where the State presented testimony from Arianna, her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922722 - 2025-03-04
of the bathroom. The case proceeded to a bench trial where the State presented testimony from Arianna, her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922722 - 2025-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
. While we disagree with the trial court that Flowers should have raised the challenge in a Knight[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13
. While we disagree with the trial court that Flowers should have raised the challenge in a Knight[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13
State v. Michael S. Johnson
, convicting him after a jury trial of two counts of attempted first-degree intentional homicide while armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24960 - 2006-05-02
, convicting him after a jury trial of two counts of attempted first-degree intentional homicide while armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24960 - 2006-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
) the trial court’s exercise of sentencing discretion in imposing the maximum sentence. We conclude that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50287 - 2010-05-24
) the trial court’s exercise of sentencing discretion in imposing the maximum sentence. We conclude that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50287 - 2010-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. DeMichele argues that the trial court’s decision is based on the misapprehension that the right angle method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83144 - 2012-06-05
. DeMichele argues that the trial court’s decision is based on the misapprehension that the right angle method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83144 - 2012-06-05
[PDF]
State v. James C. Berlin
entered into in the trial court. No. 95-1948-CR -2- The court, however, relieved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9373 - 2017-09-19
entered into in the trial court. No. 95-1948-CR -2- The court, however, relieved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9373 - 2017-09-19
William Charles Sharp v. Thomas M. Hughes
’ and Hugheses’ properties. The Sharps argue the trial court erred when it concluded the Hugheses had record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18163 - 2005-05-16
’ and Hugheses’ properties. The Sharps argue the trial court erred when it concluded the Hugheses had record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18163 - 2005-05-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and that this court should exercise its discretion to grant him a new trial “because the controversy was not fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077834 - 2026-02-18
and that this court should exercise its discretion to grant him a new trial “because the controversy was not fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077834 - 2026-02-18
Jerome E.M. v. Gail M.
a bench trial. She argues that the trial court erred in concluding that she was not entitled to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14553 - 2005-03-31
a bench trial. She argues that the trial court erred in concluding that she was not entitled to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14553 - 2005-03-31