Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7981 - 7990 of 9176 for op.

State v. Peter J. Davies
to a chemical test for alcohol concentration. See State v. Davies, No. 02-1899, unpublished slip op. (WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5737 - 2005-03-31

U.S. Bank National Association v. City of Milwaukee
and summarily reversing the trial court. 5616 Corp. v. Reavey, No. 03-0092, unpublished slip op. (WI App Aug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6279 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Milwaukee Redevelopment Authority v. Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 2874
. Redevelopment Auth., No. 01-1642, unpublished slip op. (WI App Feb. 12, 2002). Much of the factual background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5171 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
will be reinstated. See majority op., ¶30. The majority's comments about what Attorney Schoenecker might do
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213414 - 2018-07-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
., No. 2019AP1709, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 29, 2021).6 There, Travis, who had reportedly fallen near
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534011 - 2022-06-22

[PDF] NOTICE
and 2009AP1338, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. May 26, 2010), for review of the issue “whether WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58403 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2021AP1887-FT, unpublished slip op. (WI App Apr. 28, 2022), this court interpreted the phrase “residual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654431 - 2023-05-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2019AP1989-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶44 (WI App Feb. 11, 2021) (noting that it “was not entirely clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912744 - 2025-02-19

Charles J. Mueller v. Diana M. Kearns
not agree with the trial court’s exercise in order to sustain it. Independent Milk Producers Co-op v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3129 - 2005-03-31

Town of Lyndon v. Robert A. Oines
that the future conduct of the defendant will cause the plaintiff irreparable harm. Pure Milk Prods. Co-op. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5730 - 2005-03-31