Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7981 - 7990 of 64288 for records/1000.

Leslie A. Siebert v. Janet E. Siebert
erroneously denied her request for a contribution to her attorney fees. Because the record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14568 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Leslie A. Siebert v. Janet E. Siebert
for a contribution to her attorney fees. Because the record reflects a rational basis for the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14568 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
court of record,” and he is “unaware of any evidence being properly admitted in the instant matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30124 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2010AP2623 4 has developed a reviewable record reflecting a preliminary factual investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76264 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Columbia County Department of Human Services v. Miechelle G.
3 For reasons that are not entirely clear from the record, the department dismissed the earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6179 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Mighty T. Howell
was ineffective for failing to raise these issues in the direct appeal. Because the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25906 - 2017-09-21

State v. William E. Marberry
), Stats.[1] The court did not enter the relevant order until July 1998, and nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14594 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the suppression motion. Based upon a review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069632 - 2026-02-03

COURT OF APPEALS
that: (1) Green failed to make a preliminary showing that would entitle him to the sealed juror records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103473 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
the specifics of these issues should refer to the records and briefs filed with the Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929250 - 2025-03-14