Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7991 - 8000 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7991 - 8000 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
are undisputed, as they are in this case, our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
are undisputed, as they are in this case, our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Whether the jury was properly instructed is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
. Whether the jury was properly instructed is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Whether the appeal is procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tillman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013580 - 2025-09-25
). Whether the appeal is procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tillman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013580 - 2025-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175, 176 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175, 176 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
Town of Vernon v. Village of Big Bend
. We review a summary judgment determination de novo, independent of the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14894 - 2005-03-31
. We review a summary judgment determination de novo, independent of the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14894 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark A. Sturm
justifying police to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
justifying police to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is appropriate because the Department concedes that de novo review—the level of lowest deference and highest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34478 - 2008-11-03
is appropriate because the Department concedes that de novo review—the level of lowest deference and highest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34478 - 2008-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo. Kasten v. Doral Dental USA, LLC, 2007 WI 76, ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37361 - 2009-07-08
of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo. Kasten v. Doral Dental USA, LLC, 2007 WI 76, ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37361 - 2009-07-08
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
Town of Mount Pleasant v. Gerald Hoornstra
of a zoning ordinance to a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See County of Sauk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12732 - 2005-03-31
of a zoning ordinance to a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See County of Sauk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12732 - 2005-03-31