Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7991 - 8000 of 73981 for public records.
Search results 7991 - 8000 of 73981 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP2404-CRNM 2 and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110011 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP2404-CRNM 2 and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110011 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Ehmann First Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Gregory M. Weber
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140324 - 2017-09-21
. Ehmann First Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Gregory M. Weber
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140324 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing a sentence imposed by the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34707 - 2008-11-24
or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing a sentence imposed by the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34707 - 2008-11-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143331 - 2017-09-21
-CRNM 2 has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143331 - 2017-09-21
Robert D. Zitowsky v. Dane County
authorized by the appointment of yourself. A review of average amounts paid by the public defender’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13651 - 2005-03-31
authorized by the appointment of yourself. A review of average amounts paid by the public defender’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the supplemental no-merit report and the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107627 - 2017-09-21
review of the supplemental no-merit report and the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107627 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35032 - 2008-12-29
disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35032 - 2008-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report, the responses, and our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246700 - 2019-09-18
consideration of the no-merit report, the responses, and our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246700 - 2019-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in order to protect the public. The record reveals that the trial court’s discretionary sentence had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106249 - 2017-09-21
in order to protect the public. The record reveals that the trial court’s discretionary sentence had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106249 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143331 - 2015-06-16
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143331 - 2015-06-16