Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 81 - 90 of 45080 for Cost-effective.
Search results 81 - 90 of 45080 for Cost-effective.
Frontsheet
suspension effective November 11, 2008). The referee also recommended Attorney Woods be ordered to pay costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66463 - 2011-06-22
suspension effective November 11, 2008). The referee also recommended Attorney Woods be ordered to pay costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66463 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
Robert Stanek v. John C. Mickelson
of costs in Mickelson's judgment. The matter is remanded for the limited purpose of recalculating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8794 - 2017-09-19
of costs in Mickelson's judgment. The matter is remanded for the limited purpose of recalculating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8794 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 100
by the referee. We further direct Attorney No. 2006AP2629-D 2 Gernetzke to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33456 - 2014-09-15
by the referee. We further direct Attorney No. 2006AP2629-D 2 Gernetzke to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33456 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
OWI Guidelines District 4 (effective June 1, 2018)
Effective June 1st 2018 OWI 1st Low Range High Range .119 & below Forfeiture of $150 - $175
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2017-2.pdf - 2018-06-12
Effective June 1st 2018 OWI 1st Low Range High Range .119 & below Forfeiture of $150 - $175
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2017-2.pdf - 2018-06-12
[PDF]
OWI Guidelines District 4 (effective December 1, 2018)
Effective December 1st 2018 OWI 1st Low Range High Range .119 & below Forfeiture of $150 - $175
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2018.pdf - 2018-11-29
Effective December 1st 2018 OWI 1st Low Range High Range .119 & below Forfeiture of $150 - $175
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2018.pdf - 2018-11-29
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
for the cost of razing and removing property. Accordingly, the statutory change, effective April 26, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4166 - 2017-09-20
for the cost of razing and removing property. Accordingly, the statutory change, effective April 26, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4166 - 2017-09-20
City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
of Milwaukee $5000 plus costs as recovery for the cost of razing his property. Reischel argues that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4166 - 2010-01-28
of Milwaukee $5000 plus costs as recovery for the cost of razing his property. Reischel argues that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4166 - 2010-01-28
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Miller Carroll
pursuant to SCR 22.33(4).[2] The referee also recommended that he pay the costs of the Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16389 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to SCR 22.33(4).[2] The referee also recommended that he pay the costs of the Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16389 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Debra J.S. v. Thomas L.
award of costs to Thomas. We deem this issue waived. We affirm the order. FACTS AND LEGISLATIVE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11007 - 2017-09-19
award of costs to Thomas. We deem this issue waived. We affirm the order. FACTS AND LEGISLATIVE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11007 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 52
priorities listed in WIS. STAT. § 1.12(4) to ratemaking “to the extent cost-effective, technically feasible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835405 - 2024-10-17
priorities listed in WIS. STAT. § 1.12(4) to ratemaking “to the extent cost-effective, technically feasible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835405 - 2024-10-17