Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 81 - 90 of 163 for ott.
Search results 81 - 90 of 163 for ott.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The latter computer was retrieved after having been sold to Daniel Ott and Raye Ann Koenigs. ¶5 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36801 - 2009-06-16
. The latter computer was retrieved after having been sold to Daniel Ott and Raye Ann Koenigs. ¶5 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36801 - 2009-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
G. The latter computer was retrieved after having been sold to Daniel Ott and Raye Ann Koenigs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36801 - 2014-09-15
G. The latter computer was retrieved after having been sold to Daniel Ott and Raye Ann Koenigs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36801 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law which we review de novo. Ott v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc., 2006 WI App 77, ¶11, 292
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27594 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law which we review de novo. Ott v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc., 2006 WI App 77, ¶11, 292
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27594 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
novo. Ott v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc., 2006 WI App 77, ¶11, 292 Wis. 2d 173, 716 N.W.2d 127
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27594 - 2006-12-26
novo. Ott v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc., 2006 WI App 77, ¶11, 292 Wis. 2d 173, 716 N.W.2d 127
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27594 - 2006-12-26
Randy Major v. County of Milwaukee
ATTORNEYSOn behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Robert G. Ott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9060 - 2005-03-31
ATTORNEYSOn behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Robert G. Ott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9060 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, LYNN RITTENHOUSE-LEATHERBERRY AND MICHELE OTT, DEFENDANTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32526 - 2014-09-15
., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, LYNN RITTENHOUSE-LEATHERBERRY AND MICHELE OTT, DEFENDANTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32526 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Randy Major v. County of Milwaukee
G. Ott and Robert A. McKnight of Corporation Counsel, of Milwaukee. COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9060 - 2017-09-19
G. Ott and Robert A. McKnight of Corporation Counsel, of Milwaukee. COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9060 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Rittenhouse-Leatherberry and Michele Ott, Defendants. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32526 - 2008-04-23
Rittenhouse-Leatherberry and Michele Ott, Defendants. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32526 - 2008-04-23
Barbara Cohn v. Town of Randall
Title of Case: † Petition for review filed Barbara Cohn, Bob Rohr, David Ott, Larry Yakutis, Stan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2911 - 2005-03-31
Title of Case: † Petition for review filed Barbara Cohn, Bob Rohr, David Ott, Larry Yakutis, Stan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Barbara Cohn v. Town of Randall
Complete Title of Case: † Petition for review filed BARBARA COHN, BOB ROHR, DAVID OTT, LARRY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2911 - 2017-09-19
Complete Title of Case: † Petition for review filed BARBARA COHN, BOB ROHR, DAVID OTT, LARRY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2911 - 2017-09-19