Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 81 - 90 of 21279 for warrants.
Search results 81 - 90 of 21279 for warrants.
[PDF]
NOTICE
his motions to No. 2009AP310-CR 2 suppress evidence because the search warrants used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48812 - 2014-09-15
his motions to No. 2009AP310-CR 2 suppress evidence because the search warrants used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48812 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kimy E. Trotter
suppressed because the warrant that served as the basis for the search was overbroad in its description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13202 - 2017-09-21
suppressed because the warrant that served as the basis for the search was overbroad in its description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13202 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denial of his motion to suppress the evidence that was obtained after a second search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213111 - 2018-05-22
denial of his motion to suppress the evidence that was obtained after a second search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213111 - 2018-05-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
against him for one count of possession of child pornography. Cardiel argues that the warrant issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49247 - 2014-09-15
against him for one count of possession of child pornography. Cardiel argues that the warrant issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49247 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas Giegler
was ineffective by not challenging the search warrant, and whether the trial court erred in its pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2862 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective by not challenging the search warrant, and whether the trial court erred in its pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2862 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Giegler
. The issues are whether his counsel was ineffective by not challenging the search warrant, and No. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2862 - 2017-09-19
. The issues are whether his counsel was ineffective by not challenging the search warrant, and No. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2862 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
accident. The blood sample was obtained pursuant to a warrant, and the single issue presented on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24
accident. The blood sample was obtained pursuant to a warrant, and the single issue presented on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24
2008 WI APP 47
¶2 On March 21, 2005, police obtained a search warrant for Pender’s residence. The warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31842 - 2008-03-18
¶2 On March 21, 2005, police obtained a search warrant for Pender’s residence. The warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31842 - 2008-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a search warrant at Clayton-Jones’s house and seized a digital camera and other items. The warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315754 - 2020-12-17
a search warrant at Clayton-Jones’s house and seized a digital camera and other items. The warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315754 - 2020-12-17
[PDF]
from his residence. The issue in this appeal is whether the warrant’s authorization to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470042 - 2022-01-10
from his residence. The issue in this appeal is whether the warrant’s authorization to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470042 - 2022-01-10