Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 801 - 810 of 1808 for indigency.
Search results 801 - 810 of 1808 for indigency.
[PDF]
State v. David G. Grimm
found that he was not indigent, meaning that he did not qualify for a court- appointed lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9124 - 2017-09-19
found that he was not indigent, meaning that he did not qualify for a court- appointed lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9124 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was adjourned for cause to allow the circuit court to conduct an indigency hearing, which was held on April 17
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102475 - 2017-09-21
was adjourned for cause to allow the circuit court to conduct an indigency hearing, which was held on April 17
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102475 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, providing an affidavit of indigency. The circuit court granted the request with the proviso that he repay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31725 - 2008-02-05
, providing an affidavit of indigency. The circuit court granted the request with the proviso that he repay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31725 - 2008-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
deny an indigent appellant’s request for a transcript if the appeal is not arguably meritorious. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201648 - 2017-11-07
deny an indigent appellant’s request for a transcript if the appeal is not arguably meritorious. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201648 - 2017-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was indigent but noted that Garbe’s probation required him to work such that he could pay restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503774 - 2022-04-06
was indigent but noted that Garbe’s probation required him to work such that he could pay restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503774 - 2022-04-06
State v. David G. Grimm
was not indigent, meaning that he did not qualify for a court-appointed lawyer. It is also noted that earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9124 - 2005-03-31
was not indigent, meaning that he did not qualify for a court-appointed lawyer. It is also noted that earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9124 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of indigency for any other purpose. By order dated August 8, 2012, we also advised Rosanne
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106071 - 2017-09-21
of indigency for any other purpose. By order dated August 8, 2012, we also advised Rosanne
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106071 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott A. Struebing
indigency. We affirm because this argument was soundly rejected in State v. Drexler, 2003 WI App 169, 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5497 - 2005-03-31
indigency. We affirm because this argument was soundly rejected in State v. Drexler, 2003 WI App 169, 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5497 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
[guardian ad litem compensation and fees] because a parent is indigent, the court may also order either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36842 - 2009-06-17
[guardian ad litem compensation and fees] because a parent is indigent, the court may also order either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36842 - 2009-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2016AP1353-CR 4 ¶6 Taylor argues that he should have had an indigency hearing to address his ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212294 - 2018-05-09
. No. 2016AP1353-CR 4 ¶6 Taylor argues that he should have had an indigency hearing to address his ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212294 - 2018-05-09