Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8001 - 8010 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 8001 - 8010 of 12912 for prosecuting.
State v. Daniel J. Jurkovic
prosecution for drunk driving as evidence of the driver’s consciousness of guilt.” Id. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16299 - 2005-03-31
prosecution for drunk driving as evidence of the driver’s consciousness of guilt.” Id. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16299 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the homicide conviction; specifically, he claims that the testimony of the prosecution’s lead witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33536 - 2008-07-29
the homicide conviction; specifically, he claims that the testimony of the prosecution’s lead witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33536 - 2008-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
requires the prosecution to disclose exculpatory and mitigating evidence. The song is not exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31408 - 2008-01-07
requires the prosecution to disclose exculpatory and mitigating evidence. The song is not exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31408 - 2008-01-07
[PDF]
State v. Duane R. Bull
required her to have sexual relations with Bull. Bull was prosecuted in both Dane and Columbia counties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11558 - 2017-09-19
required her to have sexual relations with Bull. Bull was prosecuted in both Dane and Columbia counties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11558 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gerald D. Schrank
is entitled to prosecute with earnestness and vigor and is entitled to strike hard blows, but not foul ones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7001 - 2005-03-31
is entitled to prosecute with earnestness and vigor and is entitled to strike hard blows, but not foul ones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7001 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Montreavous L. Gray
for withdrawal and if withdrawal does not substantially prejudice the prosecution. State v. Canedy, 161 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7267 - 2017-09-20
for withdrawal and if withdrawal does not substantially prejudice the prosecution. State v. Canedy, 161 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7267 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Gary O. McKenzie
the steps described by the prosecutor, McKenzie apparently decided to attempt to prosecute his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26196 - 2017-09-21
the steps described by the prosecutor, McKenzie apparently decided to attempt to prosecute his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26196 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
prejudice to the respondent's defense of the proceeding or the prosecution of the complaint
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161389 - 2017-09-21
prejudice to the respondent's defense of the proceeding or the prosecution of the complaint
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161389 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends she did not understand PTAC liability, as she mistakenly believed she could be prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132233 - 2017-09-21
contends she did not understand PTAC liability, as she mistakenly believed she could be prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132233 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Louis Elizondo, Jr.
, the right to call witnesses in his defense and to cross-examine prosecution witnesses, the right to a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10169 - 2017-09-19
, the right to call witnesses in his defense and to cross-examine prosecution witnesses, the right to a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10169 - 2017-09-19